Financial fraud is now the most prevalent crime in the UK costing the industry is £190 billion per year. Globally this figure was an eye-watering $1.45 trillion in 2019!
How I suffered from financial fraud, a real-world case
Many of us have suffered from this ‘victimless’ crime. I myself fell victim to fraudulent activity just three weeks ago – it went something like this:
- I receive a notification on my mobile phone
- It’s my company banking app indicating a near £3,000 payment
- I know immediately it’s fraud
- A second notification comes in whilst I’m looking at my phone
- Another £2,500 gone
Then comes the fear, panic, and that horrible knot in your stomach; I log-in, cancel the card, and call customer services. 30 minutes later they answer and finally tell me they’ll look into it.
The good news is that eventually the bank dealt with it and we got our money back. But there are victims. Firstly, there has been losses somewhere down the chain of financial transactions. And secondly, I’m a very unhappy customer who no-longer trusts my bank – why? Because as a human experiencing those events in real-time, it was so obviously financial crime.
Why couldn’t the bank detect and prevent it?
The first transaction will be genuinely difficult (but not impossible) to detect. But the second one should have been easy. Let’s look at the facts:
- Both transactions were large
- Both were made with new vendors that I’ve never transacted with before
- Both were made within a minute of each other
To detect the second transaction, a level 1 ML system would have less than 1 minute to:
- Intercept the second transaction
- Compare it to the first
- Realise that two high-value transactions within seconds of each other to two new vendors is suspicious
- Respond with a message to block the transaction
Step 3 is the critical part. For a machine to have this ‘realisation’ it must be trained on historic data representing a similar set of scenarios. This is where a level 1 ML system uses huge volumes of historic data stored in a data warehouse to train the neural network ‘off-line’. The goal is to show the ML model enough examples of fraud so that it can detect similar situations in the future. The model is then deployed to an ‘on-line’ environment where it should make accurate predictions on new data streams. If this happens quickly enough (in less than a minute) then £2,500 of fraud is prevented.
What if this pattern of events wasn’t present in the historic training data?
In this case, there would still be some loss as the ML system has no experience of the fraudulent pattern. In a level 1 ML system these data sets would eventually be incorporated into the historic data and the ML model would be re-trained to detect them automatically, unfortunately, this is where the losses can mount, as the time it takes the customer service team to report the fraud to the ML team, to have them re-train, test and deploy their models could take anything from a day to a month – all the while there’d be a vulnerability in the system.
A level 2 ML system could dramatically reduce future losses by immediately incorporating this new information into its training data. Imagine this scenario occurring after I notice the fraudulent transactions:
- I log into my banking app
- I click the first transaction and mark it as fraudulent
- The app asks me to select any other strange transactions
- I select the second one and submit my customer service request
I’ve only made three user inputs across a four-step customer journey, but look at the potential – the level 2 ML system immediately:
- Updates the ML model with the new data
- Tests the updated model against a range of similar scenarios
- Validates the improvements and incorporates the update in the production system
The world’s best level 2 ML systems can automatically achieve this loop in 10 minutes, dramatically reducing the potential for future losses. And whilst not all fraud can be eliminated entirely, the second data-driven process also delivers a better customer experience because their interaction with the app could result in a rapid-response callback, rather than the customer waiting in the general customer service queue for 30 mins – a much better outcome than the one I experienced!
How could a bank build a real-time fraud detection system with Quix?
We built Quix to help teams build real-time data processing systems quickly, even if they don’t have a budget or expert resources in-house. With Quix, a bank could build a prototype of this fraud detection system in less than an hour by:
- Step 1. Sign up for a free account and create a workspace.
- Step 2. Create two topics, one to stream all transaction data and a second to stream the results of a real-time model.
- Step 3. Write a service to stream some random transaction events to the first topic
- Step 4. For the prototype model, write a simple application service that looks for incoming transaction events and compares them to subsequent events occurring on the same streamID.
Simple logic will do, for now, just to test the system. Have your model write a new event to the second topic when two transactions are within 30 seconds of each other.
Quix lets you focus on the business problem
As you can see, any developer in a bank could prototype a real-time fraud-detection system quickly with Quix, but the reality is that putting such a system into production would be considerably harder. The bank would need to involve compliance teams to understand legal and ethical issues, product design teams to think about the user experience, product engineering to implement the new feature, and data scientists to build and maintain the ML models.
There is a lot of work to do, but at least Quix takes care of the infrastructure for this system allowing a bank to focus its resources on value-added activities like developing the machine-learning models and building an amazing customer experience, rather than building and maintaining the infrastructure on which it runs. See it for yourself by registering today…